Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Information Literacy Escape Room - Escape from the Troll: Guides for the Search

Guidance for defeating Information Trolls

As I was doing a Google search on my phone, I remembered something my college professors said about checklists and guides to help you check to see if documents and websites are reliable.

Maybe I can remember a couple of ways to check the Troll's story.

4 Moves and a Habit - Web Literacy for Student Fact Checkers

What are the 4 Moves? 

  

When confronted with a claim that may not be 100% true what people need most are things they can do to get closer to the truth. They need something I have decided to call “moves.”

Moves accomplish intermediate goals in the fact-checking process.  They are associated with specific tactics. Here are the four moves this guide will hinge on:

  • Check for previous work: Look around to see if someone else has already fact-checked the claim or provided a synthesis of research.
  • Go upstream to the source: Go “upstream” to the source of the claim. Most web content is not original. Get to the original source to understand the trustworthiness of the information.
  • Read laterally: Read laterally.[1] Once you get to the source of a claim, read what other people say about the source (publication, author, etc.). The truth is in the network.
  • Circle back: If you get lost, hit dead ends, or find yourself going down an increasingly confusing rabbit hole, back up and start over knowing what you know now. You’re likely to take a more informed path with different search terms and better decisions.

Caulfield, Michael A. (n.d.). Web literacy for student fact checkers. Retrieved from https://webliteracy.pressbooks.com/chapter/four-strategies/

The CRAAP Test - Tools for Checking Sources

Current

  • What is the publication date?
  • Based on your topic, is it current enough?
  • Are links to other info working?

Reliable

  • Is information factual and balanced?
  • Are there references, quotes, data?
  • Do you note any bias or opinions?

Authority

Accuracy

  • Where does the information come from?
  • Can the information be verified elsewhere? 
  • Is there evidence to support facts provided?

 

Purpose / Point of View

  • What's the intent of the content (to persuade, to sell you something, etc.)?
  • Does the content try to appeal to your emotions (make you angry, sad, glad) instead of providing balanced facts?
  • Are there ads on the website? How do they relate to the topic being covered? (i.e. ads for personal loans while researching student debt)
  • Who is the intended audience? Who might benefit from believing? 

 

Lindsey LeFeber

Oakton Community College Library